Relix Magazine: Free Digital Issue Exclusive:Dave Matthews Band, Phoenix, Levon Helm, Sonic Youth, Michael Travis, Passion Pit, Jack White.s Dead Weather, Dave Schools Chats with J Mascis JOIN US and Subscribe now!


Home
Feature Articles
News Archives
BoxScores: Setlists
Photo Galleries

CD Reviews
DVD Reviews
Show Reviews
Departments
Columns
Jambands.com 250
Radio Charts

Jambands/Relix Store
Homegrown Store

Registered Boards
    General
    Musicians
    Tape Trades
    Tickets


Classifieds
Have / Wants
Messages
Musicians / Bands
Personals



Monthly Contributors:
     Dean Budnick, Editor
    Jesse Jarnow
    David Steinberg
    John Zinkand
    Andy Miller
    Mike Greenhaus
    Mike Gruenberg
    Patrick Buzby
    Dan Alford
    Randy Ray
    Annabel Lukins
    Dan Greenhaus

 

Tour Links
Band Links
Fan Site Links


Past Issues

Privacy Statement
Contact Jambands



    Go Cold Turkey!   

   


BRAIN TUBA: Animation Music
Jesse Jarnow
2002-07-23

On the way down to Bonnaroo, I played an album for my friend called Black Foliage: Animation Music by the Olivia Tremor Control. I tried to explain that it turned me on for many of the same reasons that improvised and live music turns me on. There is no improvisation in the proper sense on Black Foliage, and my friend had a hard time seeing the connection between the two ideas. "It just sounds like The Beatles!" he said. Well, that's true. It does sound like The Beatles. The Olivia Tremor Control made their home inside a mammoth wall of sound. On a given song, lurking somewhere in the vicinity, is other stuff -- bells, chimes, horns, ambient noises, sound collages, toy pianos, whistles, theramins, snippets of people describing their dreams, and other stuff. The total effect is overwhelming but wonderful. When I hear Black Foliage, I hear the group collaborative process just as much as I do in, say, a Phish jam.

The main difference is the sense of scale. Where a jam played by live musicians is linear, the creation of an album (or, at least, an album like Black Foliage) is in bits and pieces, fitting things together like a puzzle. They are two different kinds of conversation. In the former, each musician retains his own voice, simply because that's all he has to work with. The conversation is filled with logical arguments, each part building only on what is around it. In the latter, assuming that there is more than just the basic tracks of a live band performing, the voice is necessarily subsumed by the whole, as (ideally) each member contributes equally to the whole. It is a bit more impressionistic. Each part can only react to what came before it in the mix.

They are two different ideas about how to conceive music, each of which captures something vital and alive about it. My friend's main confusion with the argument, I think, was that improvisation happens in the moment and, if it's on tape and layered and all of that, it necessarily has to be thought out and planned. With a work like Black Foliage (or Radiohead's Kid A or the Disco Biscuits' They Missed The Perfume), there are so many layers that - while the musicians may've had an idea about what the final work would sound like - it certainly wasn't a scored piece of music.

In that sense, the creation of a studio collage like Black Foliage might be even more intuitive than a live improvisation, simply because the musicians have to anticipate what might come next without actually hearing it. (And, in the case of Black Foliage, which was recorded at home on an eight-track, there was no way to go back and reconfigure previous tracks to later overdubs.) Composition, of course (as a friend is fond of telling me), is just very slow improvisation. What I enjoy about improvised music - on either scale - is hearing something being created as the product of human communication and collaboration, the way ideas interact and meld with each other. It is music that could not be created in any other way.

A few months back, I saw the production of a play called Sibling Ribaldry. The play was put on by a bunch of improvising actors, though the play itself wasn't improvised. Instead, it was created in rehearsal over the course of several months, letting the characters develop and the plots emerge from there. The result was something with idiosyncratic and almost nonsensical plot twists -- a totality that could never have been the product of a single mind. The play held together with a tangled and cluttered grace, like a Rube Goldberg invention or a functioning governmental bureaucracy. The beauty of the plot was precisely in the frozen creative process.

The same could be said for Black Foliage. It is filled with stereo pans and tape edits. A description of the album's concept, from the Elephant 6 website reads: "First, a section of the bass guitar riff from 'Black Foliage (Itself)' was taken. Subsequently, 'variations' of this part spawned the 'animation' tracks. These were then combined with parts of the other songs (which themselves contained parts of other songs) to create the 'combination' tracks, creating interludes between the main songs... as it says in the liners note the album: 'edits within edits within edits...'".

Every tape edit, every pan, every bleep and every knob twist on Black Foliage is a movement inside the music, an animation. More importantly, each one of these things is an artistic choice that represents some kind of communication. This is what comes through on the disc. And that is why I like it.

All of this isn't necessarily to lavish praises on Black Foliage (though I guess it sorta is), but to suggest that more bands might adopt (and adapt) approaches like this. Too often, bands (especially ones that spend the bulk of their time playing and improvising live) enter the studio and record versions of their live repertoire, perhaps with a few overdubbed embellishments (horns and backing vocals and acoustic guitars and a guest or two and whatnot). It's a damn shame, really, especially because the choice to improvise in a live setting seems akin (theoretically) to committing to rethinking and experimenting with their material on a regular basis. To do in one medium (the live performance) and to not do in another (the studio), seems like an inherent contradiction if a band is really dedicated to the idea.

In the studio, many groups record Platonic versions of their songs, attempting to make them somehow definitive by stripping away the layers of improvisation. The net result is that the character of the band often disappears, too. On one hand, yes, it is a bit silly to go into the studio to record endless jamming (which doesn't usually work, anyway). On the other hand, that doesn't mean that the creative processes used to create live jams has to be entirely absent.

Performing live is a time-based medium -- one has, say, a three hour block of time, five musicians, and a finite amount of instruments and sonic space to work with. The aspect of time isn't entirely absent from the studio, but one is responsible for (and capable of) filling it in very different ways. What is effective in one setting will almost inevitably not work in the other. So it goes. Studio time is expensive. ProTools is not. If bands are to make great albums, they must learn to animate, one frame at a time.

Jesse Jarnow is mixed quadraphonically.

Back to Columns/Jesse Jarnow
Search jambands.com Search WWW

Search provided by Google.com