Thread Drift
I was going to write a different column, one that was going to be a
song by song analysis of SCI's NYE run - from the drek that was the
ironically titled "Inspiration" on the 29th, to the amazing peak of
the "Round the Wheel -> Indian Creek" on the 30th, to my struggle to
just not walk out on the show on the 31st - but I had second
thoughts. Who wants to read a long column that boils down to,
"Despite being with great people, I would have been just as happy
staying home this New Years?"
Not only would a column like that annoy my readers, this isn't a
thought that I want to dwell on. I'm reminded of a scene in
Kurt Busiek's Astro City. KBAC is a comic book that uses the
conceit of assuming that all of the weirdness that takes place in the
comic book reality were happening in a real world. It then proceeds
to ask the question of what it would like to live there. How does a
reporter cover the insanity that happens there? What would it be like
to live in constant danger from super villains? What do the
superheroes do on their night off? To answer the last question, there's
an issue that is a date between their Superman (Samaritan) and Wonder
Woman (Winged Victory). The date starts out in their civilian
ids. While for the Samaritan, looking like a normal person is just
like putting on a costume, for Winged Victory, she actually physically
changes into a non-powered person. Samaritan asks her why she doesn't
spend any time in that ID (she was using the apartment of a coworker
because she didn't have her own) and she said that every time she
changed back, she was terrified that she would never be able to have
the power again. That's how a bad show affects me. When I look
around and see people grooving, while I just stand there wishing I had
a book (and find myself singing Suzanne Vega's "Solitude Standing":
And she takes my wrist, I feel her imprint of fear
And I say "I've never thought of finding you here"
I turn to the crowd as they're watching
They're sitting all together in the dark in the warm
I wanted to be in there among them
I see how their eyes are gathered into one
) and I worry if the last 13 years have been a lie, if
this entire power through music thing is just a myth that I have made
up, and it will never work for me again.
If the band were dropping chords left and right and forgetting words and acting like
Jerry in 1995, that would be one thing. Not enjoying it would make sense. When the
band seems to be playing well - based on the reaction of other fans - but nothing is
happening, where, instead of being catapulted to a world where there is you and there
is the music and there is nothing else in the entire universe, you're thinking, "Are
we near the setbreak yet? I wonder who else is here that I want to hang out with," that's
just very scary and upsetting. Few enough things can get past my logical brain; I don't
want there to be one fewer.
So while I don't want to dwell on how boring I found these shows to
be, what might be interesting though is to
try to figure out what changed. How did the band that I thought was
the best touring outfit going in 1998 become a band that is barely
tempting me to go to their Seattle shows in 2001? Was it me that
changed or was it them? After thinking about it, and talking over it
with long time SCI supporter (and Mountain Girl founder) Teresa, I
came to a conclusion. While some of it might be me becoming sick of
them, String Cheese Incident are clearly a different band now than
they were as recently as late 1998.
When I first started seeing them, SCI was a hybrid band. Despite
playing mostly other styles, they were still at their heart a
bluegrass band. Perhaps a better way of saying it was that they were
a mountain band. The poster I got at my first show describes them as
"Your All-Weather Mountain Dance Band," and that's what they
were. Their songs had a certain form of spiritualism that came from
being in touch with nature. Their jams hit that same path. When
the darkness of the middle section of "Land's End" resolved into the
peak build up jam, it was like the first sunny warm day after a long
winter. Even the decorations they used were nature themed; batiks
were hung depicting people hula hooping in the mountains. One got the
impression of a bunch of people sitting on a porch playing
music. They took all of the fun of a band like The Recipe and added
amazing musicianship and some signs of dark playing. For a
while they were like a dream come true.
It's hard to believe it was only a year ago that the standard
complaint about SCI was that they were a little too dependent on
speeding up their jams. They've moved so far away from that that I
found myself missing the energy. Instead of a hyped up roots based
band with jazz influence, SCI are now more of a funk groove
band. Don't get me wrong, I know that bands have to evolve or they
just get stagnant and bored. I can even accept this musical
direction, knowing that they might come out of it (Phish followed up
the endless funk that bored me in 97 with the beautiful ambience of
2000). What is actively bothering me though is the change in the
style of
lyrics. It's almost as though the band is on a mission to save the
world. Songs like "Open Wide" and "Make a Joyful Sound" seem forced
in their attempts to deliver their message. The change occurred so
suddenly that I went looking throught their influences, trying to find
someone who would insprire that sort of lyrical shift.
And that leads us to John Dwork. As far as I can tell, Dwork was an
amazing person. He worked hard on his spirituality his entire life and
learned some things as a result. All he wants to do is to pass on
what he has learned to the rest of us. Unfortunately, it's not that
easy.
When I was teaching math, I had a dilemma. I'm a slacker. I always
hated to do homework. I wished that I could get my students to
understand the concepts that I was teach immediately. Unfortunately,
math doesn't work that way. No one really understands a mathematical
concept until they work with it. The Complete the Square method or
the Chain Rule might make sense on the blackboard, but until you've
solved 20 or 30 problems with it, it won't really be part of you. I
hated to do it, but I ended up being a bit of a slave driver in terms
of homework assigned. Well mysticism is the same way. You can
wrestle with demons, go through the long dark night of the soul, fight
your inner terrors, and have moments of true bliss, that - when you
come back to the mundane world - can be expressed in terms of normal
words and concepts, but the concepts won't mean as much to anyone
unless they put the work in themselves. Trying to teach a lesson like this
doesn't involve teaching what you've learned, it involves
teaching people to find a way of getting to where you were when you
learned it.
There's a koan about a goose. When it was really small,
it was forced through the neck of of a bottle and now lives inside the
bottle itself. It's too big to go through the neck now. The question
is, how do you get the goose out of the bottle without hurting
it? The answer is that you don't. You wait for the goose to get to
the point where it wants to leave the bottle and it pecks its way
out. [1]. You can't force your teachings onto
someone. At best, you can talk to people who have discovered similar
things on their own. More normally, you talk to people who are just
bored with what you're saying and don't get it [2].
In the worst case though, you can actually cause harm.
If there's one thing to remind yourself over and over again, it's that
the map is not the territory. Two different people can encounter the
same pre-rational truth, but express it in completely different
ways. The problem comes when they argue over the differences in the
models that they have. When you teach in plain words the
enlightenment you found, you're not teaching enlightenment, you're
teaching indoctrination. You can point the way, you can gesture
really emphatically, but when you speak without using vague metaphors, you usually
are doing more harm than good.
Epilogue: I went out to see Rockin' Teenage Combo on my
birthday. I was excited for this; having an early January birthday
means that I never get birthday shows. This literally was the first
time I ever had seen music on my birthday. Almost as soon as they
started playing, I found myself moving... and being moved. Winged
Victory managed to resume her superhero identity at the end of the
story. I shouldn't be surprised that music still is a powerful force
for me.
While at the show, I talked to some friends. Nancy put forth a theory
that maybe the different style that I didn't like was a playing to the
crowd's energy thing. Then she pointed out that Vancouver was her
birthday show and she was at my birthday show so... Ok fine. Hey
SCI, I'll give you one more chance, but I'm warning you. If you're
not good, I'm going to turn you into a goon!
[1] Note: An episode of The Muppet Show
presented a different answer
to this dilemma. Gonzo - I think it was - was trapped in a
barrel. How did they get him out? They used dynamite and blew it
up. Said Gonzo afterwards, "It only hurt a little." This is just
but one example of the Zen Teachings of Jim Henson.
[2] In Rudy Rucker's classic The Secret of
Life, the protagonist wrestles with the fact that you can't bring
meaning back into words and have it mean the same thing, "No word can
really capture the Secret, practically any phrase will do. All is
One, All is One, ALL IS ONE. One what? One
of... uh... those... uh...."
David Steinberg got his Masters
Degree
in mathematics from New Mexico State University in 1994. He
first discovered the power of live music at the Capitol Centre in
1988 and never has been the same. His
Phish stats website is at www.ihoz.com/PhishStats.html